Saturday, 7 December 2013

“HAVING FUN” - THE 2013 CANON SA EXPO & COMPETITION


“HAVING FUN”  -  THE 2013 CANON SA EXPO & COMPETITION

By Loftus Viljoen



There are two major photography events that the photography community and consumers every year eagerly wait for and place it at the top of their photography social calendar.

One of these major events is the annual Canon Expo & Competition and this year was the third time that Canon hosted it.

For those of you who have read my articles, blogs and reviews would know that it is old news that I do not go to shows or expos to buy equipment or something – my main purpose is to explore and feel equipment that my local dealer does not have and [this is a big AND] I mainly go to Expos to get information and learn from the speakers at the Expo.  As photo and travel journalists my partner, Naomi Myburgh and I often get invited to events or are commissioned to do certain photo shoots and/or to write the article or story to accompany it. Many times we also have do “spec shoots” hoping to sell our photos or stories to any interested party. As such we sometimes need what is called “media accreditation” to get access to event, certain information or details or vantage points at the event. A good example of such event was this year’s Zwartkops Airshow where you had to go through a process of being accredited as part of the media corps. Apart from bring accredited you also need to do your research before the event begins and you need to pick up a story line that no-one else did. And after all that rickmarole your Editor may choose not to use your story or any of your photos. Unless there is a “show stopper” or a launch of a long anticipated product at an Expo, Editors of magazines are generally [and I emphasize the word “generally”] not interested in Expos/Shows and as a freelancer you will be wasting your time at Shows/Expos. We have had many requests to cover an event or spec articles turned down because an Editor published a year or five ago a similar story of that event [-this is a tip for Event Organizers; you need something special to attract the attention of Editors and Joe Public].

 At all events where you have to pay an entrance fee you will have to go through the process of media accreditation so it is very refreshing to go to a major event where the entry is FREE and you do not have to go through a process of accreditation and if you need any information it is FREELY available. Did I mention that entry to the Canon Expo and Competition is FREE?

As they did in previous years the build up to the third annual Canon Expo kicked off with a photo competition which is growing in popularity and making it one of the major photography competitions in the country with a Canon 6D and 24-105mm lens as prize for the winner in each of the 4 categories.

The four categories were:

1.       Let the Light in

2.       Save our planet

3.       Unposed portrait

4.       Better in Black & White.

To qualify for entry [and only one image per category was allowed] the image had to be shot with a Canon camera. The opening day for the competition was 16 September 2013 and the closing date a minute before midnight on the 1st of November 2013. A total of 3058 entries was received. The quality and standard of the competition submissions seems to get better every year and all entrants waited with abated breath to find our if they made the “finals.” With only a couple of weeks before the Expo opens the public get the opportunity to “vote” for their favourite photos [also only one vote per category] via internet, email or you could vote on the first day you attend the Expo.

When I attend an event as part of the media I want a schedule or program of what is happening where and when so that I can arrange my own plans accordingly. Last year I attended a certain event which was held over a couple of days where the organizers changed the schedules without having the courtesy of advising me or any of the media about the change. And, even if my entry was free I still had to travel to the event at my own costs, pay my parking and generally when my camera costs are calculated it works out that for every shutter speed click my camera makes it cost me money. So you can understand why I get upset when Event Organizers change the programs without notifying me about those changes.

During the period from mid September-December the attention of South African photographers is focused on two major photography events i.e. the Photo & Film Expo and the  Canon Expo Competition. This period gives the photography consumer and community basically a two and a half months of photography related activities –it is as we have a “photography window” for that period [very similar to the transfer window they have in European soccer]. The two Expos have one common goal and that is to create photography awareness.

Both these Expos takes place in the Johannesburg [Gauteng] area in the heart of South Africa’s economic hub.  Camera Dealers and Online vendors have recognized this window, done their sums and stocked their “shelves” with certain cameras/equipment as “show” specials while riding out the window period created by these Expos. More than once you will probably find the camera or equipment cheaper “Online” or at your local camera dealer than at the Expos.

On social media and everyday conversations with consumers I often find a misconception that the consumer believes that big brand names like Canon and Nikon “controls” the prices of their cameras and equipment. The simple truth is that both Canon and Nikon in South Africa import their stock from the country of manufacture [and for arguments sake let’s say Japan] at factory prices in a currency like the US dollar or the Euro. So when the Rand is weak against those currencies the price of the landed equipment will be higher –these higher costs will eventually be passed on to the end consumer.  Both Canon and Nikon [and others as well] do not sell any cameras directly to the public – they all work through a network of dealers and it would be very naïve of Joe Public to think that Canon or Nikon would “undercut” their dealers.  Canon, for instance, would use the “profits” of the sales at the Expo to cover their costs of hosting the event and distribute the “net profit” between all its authorized dealers in the form of rebates or some sort of distribution scheme. I understand that only on the first day of the Expo sales exceeded R1million.

This year something peculiar happened in or about this window period: a photography survey request was sent to various photographers and the idea was to see the latest trends and preferences of photographers – unfortunately the survey was in my view lob-sided and biased toward wildlife photographers with the questions to favour the sponsors of the survey, hence the requirement of having the respondent’s phone number and email addresses [this obviously give them a data base of interested persons and the opportunity to bombard me with emails on so-called special deals]. To encourage the respondents to complete the survey a first prize of a photographic safari for a couple of days were offered. My view is that you would have had a much better and wider sample of respondents if the first prize was a voucher of a certain amount were the winner could choose Canon/Nikon according to his/her own preferences .  The prize would be drawn at the Photo and Film Expo. The results of the survey was published online at http://www.photosurvey.co.za/results/

As always these “survey results” should be taken with a pinch of salt, but it revealed that only 4,96% of the respondents go to an Expo to buy something – the vast majority go to Expos for the same reason as I do: “We want to learn something.”


 
The results also answers the frequent question that I picked up on social media “Why don’t you have an Expo in the Western Cape?” or wherever. The results show that the vast majority of photographers are based in the Gauteng region [in fact it says 63.5% whereas the second place is the Western Cape with a mere 12,9%. The costs involved setting up an Expo are enormous and the economics just don’t justify setting up an Expo on the same scale in Cape Town.  I have seen the equipment and props set out by Canon for their Expo and it could weigh easily in excess of 30 tons and I can tell you the costs of transporting it to Cape Town will not justify the expenses and then you need to think of all the support staff [accommodation, transport and food and other logistics]. Sorry to give you bad news, Capetonians and others, but I think it is very unlikely that an expo on the scale of Gauteng will realize. Your best bet is to attend the Canon Roadshow when it comes to Cape Town and make sure that you ATTEND it.

So far the buildup to the event.

That brings me to the week or two preceding the Canon Expo: Canon posted their program [and something about Canon SA is that you can always rely on their programs and plan accordingly] with their speakers list and the first thing I noticed was that all the speakers this year were local. Going through their topics I was able to pick the day I wanted to attend.

A couple of days before the Canon Expo I picked up a vibe that they will be having a photo booth which spelt out “Having Fun with Canon.” I have done many photo booths at weddings and at Mystery Murder Dinner Parties and it is always fun and laughter so this Canon Expo was going to be fun. For this purpose Canon encouraged their visitors to bring along their cameras.

I decided I will have some photo fun and early morning on the first day of the Expo I took out some of my own photo booth props and posted a photo of myself on the Expo Facebook site and, while we were at the Expo, we thought we may just as well have a portfolio/profile shoot.

In the busy street in front of the Sandton Convention Centre where the Canon Expo was held we popped off a couple of photos.

 
As we entered to foyer to the Canon Expo we immediately noticed that they did not have photos of last year’s winners as they had the previous year. It is actually a nice touch to see the previous year’s winners so that you could compare them against the new finalists’ photos.

There was not a big crowd around and as we entered to expo hall I noticed on the right they had a series of printers and they did split up the equipment to have it all over the place. Also on the right they had a photo booth but very “commercialized” – so I put on my funny glasses and fake moustache to spice up the photo.

In the centre they had guys with skateboards and bikes doing tricks and this gave me the opportunity to play around with high ISO and capture the action shots. The lights in the Hall was not so great so my 7D had to do the trick.

No sooner or later I had to rush to the presentation by Tyme Photography on wedding and the fun started with drums and whistles we had to blow but it gave us the rhythm that even wedding photography is and should be fun and later Marlene Neumann continued with her presentation with the same theme “Have fun” live life so the vibe I picked up in the pre-program stage was there.  

Mark Mansfield on Aviation photography was, as always, good and it always amazes me that the most common questions at any Expo or course relates to the camera settings for certain shots. Mark gracefully explained why the shutter speed has to come down to capture a “prop disc” on propeller type of airplanes and how much preparation and work goes into aviation photography before a single shot is fired.   But Mark did not fail to tell us that aviation photography is fun.

In between the presentations I still had to find time to rub shoulders with the presenters as I know the most of them personally. And in between that I paused to take photos of the action in the centre.

On the other side of the hall Andrew Beck took us into a glimpse on the life of a wildlife photography guide and once again the matter of camera settings came up. I could relate to Andrew’s presentation because I did a couple of photography safaris myself and do quite a bit of wildlife photography. It is amazing to hear that there are still people with the most expensive camera gear but don’t know how to use it. As a safari guide it may sometimes become a nightmare because need to constantly remind your “customer” of settings and composition that you may lose out in taking some awesome shots yourself. Taking us through the processes of being a guide make you realize that it is hard work with a lot of preparation involved.

This year, equipment wise, there was not anything that gripped my attention as the 200-400mm lens did last year. The idea of having an “action centre” with bikers and skate boarders doing their thing was not bad as it gave action photographers and wannabee action photographers an opportunity to take some “action” shots as you can see in this article, but placing the camera/lens display and Canon staff between you [the photographer] and the “action” was not a good idea as I found that the staff was moving constantly in front of you just as you were taking the shots.

The kit I took the 2013 Canon Expo was my 7D with the 50mm f1.8 lens as well as my Canon 100-400mm USM IS L-lens.

It would have been nice to have a FREE sensor clean at the Expo though.

For the purposes of the “Having Fun” theme of this article I decided to cartoonize the most of my images herein in the post production processes, and cartoons are usually fun to look at.

My overall impression of this year’s Canon Expo was that it was good, but not as good as it was last year and despite the “Fun” theme I was missing something. Maybe I was expecting something to “Dream On” to follow up on last year’s inspiring 200-400mm lens like someone who was using the lens and did a presentation on that lens alone – someone who has pushed the lens through it phases like a wildlife photographer or action photographer telling us and showing us what the lens could do under local conditions and on various camera bodies [including cameras released this year]. I would have loved to hear the lens’ performance under low light conditions and what it could do during the “golden hour” for wildlife photography.

Comparing this year’s Expo to this year’s Canon Roadshow I must say the latter stands out and I am looking forward to next year’s events.

Loftus ©2013



 

 

Tuesday, 17 September 2013

WAT ELKE BRUID HAAR FOTOGRAAF MOET VRA



 

Wat moet elke bruid haar fotograaf vra?

Deur Loftus Viljoen [Ngonyama Photography]

September 13, 2013. Pretoria-



Ek doen hierdie blog in Afrikaans omdat daar so baie jong voornemende bruide is wat gereeld vrae in Afrikaans vra:

Vir die meeste mense is die kosbaarste herinneringe aan hulle troudag hulle foto album  en herleef hulle daardie tydlose oomblikke oor en oor deur wanneer hulle na hulle trou fotos kyk.



Met my troudag in die laat 70’s was daar nie digitale fotos nie – ons fotograaf moes met film werk en elke film het ‘n maksimum van 36 fotos op gehad. Van al die fotos wat daardie dag geneem is kon ons “professionele” fotograaf slegs vir ons 15 foto’s gee want die meeste fotos het in die prosesserings fase verlore gegaan. Daardie jare het ons gepraat van “dit het nie uitgekom nie”.  Toe ek in 1997 my vrou weens kanker verloor het, het daardie 15 foto’s en die ander wat onsself geneem het nog meer kosbaar geword.

Vandag is elke ou met ‘n selfoon ‘n “fotograaf” en elke ou met ‘n digitale kamera ‘n “professionele fotograaf”.

Wanneer  ‘n afspraak met die fotograaf  gemaak word moet die bruid na die volgende kyk en vrae  vra:

 

1.       WIE KIES DIE FOTOGRAAF?

1.1.    Ons kry dikwels navrae vanaf die Moeder van die Bruid, die Moeder van die Bruidegom en baie keer van die Bruidegom en andere en wil hulle die trou fotografie “beheer” en reël en die Bruid moet maar sommer net inval met daardie reëlings en het sy geen sê nie. DIS VERKEERD!

1.2.    Die belangrikste persoon by die troue is die Bruid en sy moet op haar gemak wees DAAROM is die keuse van die fotograaf die BRUID s’n. Sy moet met die fotograaf/fotograwe kan saamwerk ongeag wie op die ou end daarvoor betaal.

2          

             WANNEER STEL JY JOU FOTOGRAAF AAN?

2.1.    In 1983 is ek vakansie in Oos  Londen en kry ‘n oproep van ‘n vriend enkele ure voor sy troue in Kids Beach en vra of ek hom nie kan uithelp met fotos nie want sy fotograaf het hom in die  steek gelaat. Ek het van my mooiste trou fotos daardie dag op die strand geneem.

2.1.1. Vandag kan enigiemand met ‘n selfoon of i-pad  fotos neem of  enige iemand met ‘n digitale  kamera, maar dit maak nie van hulle fotograwe in die werklike sin van die woord nie – hierdie mense kan jy sommer gou-gou in die hande kry. Hulle is ook gewoonlik die goedkoopste.

2.1.2. Die regte trou fotograwe is professionele mense en in baie  gevalle word hulle lank voor die tyd geboek.

2.2.    Die beste tyd om die regte trou fotograaf te kry is sodra jy ‘n datum vir jou troue vasgestel het.  As jy in die somer trou dan is goeie trou fotograwe soeveel as 12 maande vooruit bespreek en as dit in stiller tye is dan minstens 6 maande vooruit.

2.3.    Maak jou fotograaf lank voor die tyd  vas en met oorleg.            


3.       HOE KIES JY ‘N FOTOGRAAF?

3.1.    Hoe belangrik is jou trou fotos vir jou? As dit nie so belangrik is nie – dan vra eerder jou pêlle met hulle selfone en digitale kameras om jou trou fotos  te neem: dis sommer ook die goedkoopste.

3.2.    GOEDKOOP IS DUURKOOP:  Die grootste fout wat bruide maak is om die goedkoopste pakket te kies in plaas van die volgende vraag eerste te vra: “Wat wil ek hê” – elke bruid het ‘n prentjie in haar kop van hoe sy wil lyk op haar troudag en watter fotos van haar geneem moet word. ‘n Professionele fotograaf sal ‘n lys hê van al die “must have” fotos en watter fotos hulle voorstel geneem moet word. Werk eers deur die lys van fotos wat jy, as bruid, wil hê voordat jy jou pakket of album kies. Dit is onlogies en onrealisities dat jy  verwag jou fotograaf moet 600-1000 fotos van jou troudag moet neem en jy gaan slegs 60 fotos kan kies. Onthou vir professionele toerusting kos dit elkekeer meer as R1.00 as daardie kamera kliek. Om ‘n 1000 fotos te edit teen 3 minute per  foto gaan 50 ure se werk kos of jy die bepaalde foto gekies het of nie.  Onthou die meeste van die fotograaf se werk kom na die troue.

3.3.    INHUIS FOTOGRAAF OF NIE?  Baie  trou venues maak gebruik van die sogenaamde inhuis [in house] fotograwe, asook musiek joggies en bloemiste en voeg hulle dit in een “budget” pakket. As jy van so ‘n pakket gebruik wil maak kyk sorgvuldig na die vrae wat ons hierbo en hieronder aanraak. Onthou net daar is groot waarheid in die slagspreuk “if you want to pay peanuts you will get monkeys” – maak seker dat jy nie onrealistiese verwagtinge het nie en dan later lang trane op die sosiale media huil oor hoe jy  “ingedoen” is.

3.4.    Daar is honderde mense wat sê hulle is fotograwe en die maklikste is om hulle te vra of hulle ‘n webwerf het waarna jy kan gaan kyk oor hoe lyk hulle werk. As hulle nie ‘n webwerf het waar hulle hulle fotos vertoon nie dan moet die ROOI LIGTE alreeds vir jou aangaan.

3.5.    Dan mag hulle dalk ‘n Facebook bladsy hê – gaan kyk daarna.

3.6.    Dan vra hulle om ‘n voorbeeld van hulle portfolio vir jou voor te lê: iets soos ‘n album, ‘n DVD vertoning, en voorbeelde van  hulle werk wat hulle  in hulle pakket gaan insluit.

3.7.    ‘n Professionele fotograaf sal ‘n formele kontrak hê – vra om dit te sien  en lees dit  deur.

3.8.     ‘n Professionele fotograaf sal ‘n tweede fotograaf [‘n second shooter] hê om te help om foto’s uit verskillende hoeke te neem

3.9.    Maak seker dat jou fotograaf wel beskikbaar is vir die datum waarop jy trou – en vra hom/haar om dit skriftelik aan jou te bevestig.

3.10.‘n  Professionele fotograaf sal professionele toerusting hê – vra om dit te sien.  Alle professionele  fotograwe het backup kameras en dis geen verskoning as hulle vir jou sou sê hulle kamera het geval of gebreek of battery het onklaar geraak nie.

3.11.Vra hulle ook of jy een of twee van hulle onlangse kliente kan skakel om te hoor of daardie kliente gelukkig was met hulle dienste. Kyk sommer ook op Hello Peter of enige van daardie klae-blaaie of daar iemand was wat jou jou voorgenome  fotograaf geklae het. Die meeste klagtes wat ek lees gaan oor die aflewering van die finale prokdukte.

3.12.Vra vir hulle of hulle die venue ken en of hulle al vantevore daar afgeneem het – ‘n professionele fotograaf sal tyd spandeer om voor die tyd na die venue  te ry en te ondersoek waar die beste foto geleenthede is. ‘n Fotograaf wat ‘n paar minute voor die tyd by die diens/seremonie/onthaal opdaag om fotos te kom neem, sonder om vooraf sy/haar huiswerk te doen, is in my opinie nie ‘n professionele fotograaf nie.  

3.13.Vergelyk appel met  appels: kyk wat in jou fotograaf se pakket is en vergelyk dit met ander pakkette. Dit is maar net so – party fotograwe neem beter fotos as ander en party het net bloot eenvoudig ‘n beter produk om aan te bied.

3.14.Daar is niks beter as om ‘n fisiese album met jou trou fotos in te hê nie. ‘n Fisiese album voel net beter tussen jou vingers en daar is niks lekkerder as om elke bladsy met jou fotos te streel met jou hand nie.  Statisitek wys dat ‘n koffie tafel album meer aandag trek as ‘n DVD/CD met jou fotos daarop. Party foto albums is van hoër gehalte as ander – maak seker watter een jy gaan kry.

3.15.Vra hom in watter formaat hy/sy skiet. Is dit RAW of is dit jpg?  RAW fotos bevat baie meer inligting en pixels as ‘n jpg en daarom kry jy baie minder RAW fotos op ‘n geheue kaart as in jpg formaat. In jpg formaat gaan baie van die inligting verlore. In Raw is ‘n professionele fotograaf instaat  en beter  te edit en ‘n beter eindproduk te gee. Baie fotograwe gebruik egter die jpg formaat omdat hulle meer fotos op hulle kaarte kan kry en dus gebruik hulle minder kaarte/geheue.

3.16.As jy ongemaklik is met jou fotograaf se antwoorde dan moet jy weet dis rooi ligte wat aangaan – kies eerder ‘n ander een.

4.       VIR WATTER FOTOGRAWE MOET EK OPPAS?

4.1.    SCAMMERS & BEDRIEëRS:

4.1.1. “Goedkoop fotograwe” – hierdie is gewoonlik mense wat nie self ‘n portfolio het nie en dan ander fotograwe se fotos van die Internet  steel en maak of hulle dit self geneem het.

4.1.2. Onthou daar is ‘n gesegde wat sê: “If you pay peanuts, you will get monkeys”

4.1.3. Hulle sal dan ook ‘n goedkoop pakket aanbied van bv R1500.00 en jou ‘n deposito vra van bv R500.00 en dan hoor jy nie weer van hulle nie.

4.1.4. OF - Hulle is ook die mense wat  soveel as moontlik “goedkoop” kliënte kry en dan verkoop hulle jou kontrak aan ander  “genuine” fotograwe.

4.1.5. Fotograwe wat ‘n praktyk bedryf om soveel  “bookings” op hulle boeke te plaas en dan plaas hulle hulleself in so ‘n posisie dat hulle ontslae moet raak van hulle “goedkoopste”bookings.

4.2.    Fotograwe wat nie album of gedrukte fotos aan jou kan wys of beskikbaar wil stel nie – oppas vir fotograwe wat net fotos op DVD/CD plaas. 

5.       Net om fotograwe se kostes in perspektief te plaas gaan kyk na hierdie artikel  http://www.qqafricaphotography.blogspot.com/2012/06/costing-photo-shoot-or-assignment.html  ‘n Fotografie besigheid is ‘n duur besigheid en fotograwe kry nie  hulle kinders se skoolgelde, onderrig, vervoer of motor, kameras, lense, toerusting, versekering ensovoorts  verniet nie.  Dus wanneer iemand van BEKOSTIGBAAR praat moet hulle nie die fotograwe se kos uit hulle monde wil neem nie.
Hierdie is 'n riglyn om jong bruide te help.

 

©2013  Loftus